首页> 外文OA文献 >Competitive Energy Trading Framework for Demand-side Management in Neighborhood Area Networks
【2h】

Competitive Energy Trading Framework for Demand-side Management in Neighborhood Area Networks

机译:中国需求侧管理的竞争性能源交易框架   邻域网

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper, by comparing three potential energy trading systems, studies thefeasibility of integrating a community energy storage (CES) device withconsumer-owned photovoltaic (PV) systems for demand-side management of aresidential neighborhood area network. We consider a fully-competitive CESoperator in a non-cooperative Stackelberg game, a benevolent CES operator thathas socially favorable regulations with competitive users, and a centralizedcooperative CES operator that minimizes the total community energy cost. Theformer two game-theoretic systems consider that the CES operator firstmaximizes their revenue by setting a price signal and trading energy with thegrid. Then the users with PV panels play a non-cooperative repeated gamefollowing the actions of the CES operator to trade energy with the CES deviceand the grid to minimize energy costs. The centralized CES operator cooperateswith the users to minimize the total community energy cost without appropriateincentives. The non-cooperative Stackelberg game with the fully-competitive CESoperator has a unique Stackelberg equilibrium at which the CES operatormaximizes revenue and users obtain unique Pareto-optimal Nash equilibrium CESenergy trading strategies. Extensive simulations show that thefully-competitive CES model gives the best trade-off of operating environmentbetween the CES operator and the users.
机译:本文通过比较三种潜在的能源交易系统,研究了将社区能量存储(CES)设备与消费者拥有的光伏(PV)系统集成在一起以进行居民区网络需求侧管理的可行性。我们在非合作Stackelberg游戏中考虑具有完全竞争力的CES运营商,在具有竞争性用户的情况下具有对社会有利的法规的仁慈CES运营商,并最大程度降低社区总能源成本的集中式CES运营商。以前的两个博弈论系统都认为CES运营商首先通过设置价格信号并与电网交易能量来最大程度地提高收入。然后,在CES操作员采取行动与CES设备和电网进行能源交易以最大程度地降低能源成本之后,拥有PV面板的用户将玩一次非合作重复游戏。集中式CES运营商与用户合作,以​​在没有适当激励措施的情况下将社区能源总成本降至最低。具有完全竞争力的CESoperator的非合作Stackelberg博弈具有唯一的Stackelberg平衡,在该平衡下CES运营商可以使收入最大化,并且用户可以获得独特的帕累托最优纳什均衡CESenergy交易策略。大量的仿真表明,完全竞争的CES模型在CES操作员和用户之间提供了最佳的操作环境权衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号